"I think we're tired of this notion that we're being something we're not. All around the world there are people of Irish ancestry-So instead of who we were, let's start thinking about who we're going to be. We're Irish-American and proud. Is that still allowed?"
While reading over winter break, I began to think back to the genealogy research I had been doing (see Almost Irish from Jan. 12, 2008). Several of the dead-ends bothered me. There just had to be additional information.
Through the web resources of the Sons of the American Revolution, I found a search feature for locating the graves of Patriots (primarily veterans of the Revolutionary War). Typing in surnames from my family tree, I found I hit from the right county in Pennsylvania. This turned out to be the great grandfather of my great great grandmother, whose ancestors were previously not known.
As it turns out, we have a documented lineage dating back to the American Revolution - and eligibility for membership in the SAR.
Also cleared up was confusion over the ancestry of a great grandmother (my paternal grandfather's mother).
We actually have three Patriots (all soldiers) in our ancestry.
What did this research teach me? In addition to connecting my family with one of the defining events of recent human history, the lesser result of demonstrated ethnicity (almost entirely from England). This brings us to the quote which started this post.
Yes, Nathan B. Peoples immigrated from Ireland in the early 1700s, as did virtually every other Peoples family member of Clearfield County, Pennsylvania. Almost ironically (the Peoples family is from Ulster, and Scotland before that - so not that ironic), most of the men in my direct ancestry married English-born or descended women.
As such, it is much more appropriate to use the following flags in conjunction with discussions of my family's heritage than the Irish tri-color:


